Your living entities
I know of three instances where people had success and the one common denominator is that none put a name on their correspondence.
Living entities are of the womb of a woman but the name on the BC is not; therefore that name is an artificial entity.
The only question then is who has the obligation to guarantee or indemnify the artificial entity? If you not offer over a name but reference only the artificial name, there is no way to say he gave us that name. To give a name is to make one of this world but we are not of this world. Did Jesus not say, I am not of this world?
Canada, Ontario, Her Majesty, the Crown, lawyer are artificial entities. How does a living entity communicate with an artificial entity. Why would a living entity seek remedy from an artificial entity is where I am at just plain dumb.
The key is to take yourself out of the equation leaving only the artificial entity, the legal name that is recognized in law and that is and emanates from an artificial entity as evidenced on the face of a BC. That is in essence what those 3 people I know did.
Soon as you put a name on a letter you draw them artificial entities to you. Any name is artificial. Is that what you are?
The artificial entity is recognized in law as an owner and other artificial personalities. The name is the real thing in law to which artificial personalities can be attached. They are never attached to or attachable to a living entity and artificial entities do not have jurisdiction over living entities. If such seem to be attached to you it is something you did that you go for the ride as if the artificial entity or as the guarantor or indemnifier. As far as I can tell the BC is evidence of an obligation of Her Majesty but not to you but the artificial entity identified on it.
I will elaborate more soon.
I love you