Your Majesty’s
You may recall earlier this year we got into the improper use of a birth certificate and bringing this to the attention of the Registrar General pursuant to section 53.1 (1) of the Ontario Vital Statistics Act
53.1 (1) If the Registrar General considers it necessary to verify information or to determine if any document issued or that may be issued under this Act is being, or may be, improperly used, the Registrar General shall collect, directly or indirectly, such information as he or she considers necessary from such persons and institutions as he or she considers appropriate. 2001, c. 21, s. 12.
I have been pursuing this avenue to see where it goes and today mailed the third letter. I did receive a reply to my first letter which was a typical form letter that did not mention the issue raised and there was no response to the second such letter.
I mentioned in the second letter who but me would have knowledge of improper use and still no response so I addressed that by including the following in the third letter and opportunity to cure;
Nevertheless, this is to let you know that a record of these non-responses has been recorded and may be used as evidence in other matters and furthermore, any and all claims of any sort that involve the name appearing on the Birth Certificate may be forwarded to your Office to deal with.
You can see by this process I have done all I can do and so if there is no response to the 3rd letter the ORG should, by its failure to perform as per the authorization in the Vital Statistics Act to investigate the allegation of improper use, not be surprised to receive claims against the name of a BC. Obviously if they do not want to receive such claims the Registrar General should investigate is what I am saying.
I am not saying but I think when we send letters and requests we must be prepared that we need to send at least 3 letters so as to achieve strike 3. I think many people do not do this and that may in part be why nothing is accomplished. It may be they wait to see how far we will go and it may be the third letter is when you are taken seriously. Finish what you begin.
I have also been sending letters to the Minister of Transportation concerning my inherent right to use the roads free of license (currently under suspension/alleged to be a privilege) and included a notice renouncing and waiving any and all rights and privileges conferred by or on behalf of Her Majesty that may be believed or deemed I receive the benefit of. Although I have not received a reply to the first letter, it seems to have had an effect which I shall not get into here what. I requested documentation that recognizes/acknowledges my right to use the highways free of license. The purpose of course to show law enforcement folks. I believe that the BC is that documentation but as we know, the enforcers of the highway traffic act do not see it that way and is another reason for letter to the ORG concerning improper use of the BC.
I remind of this posted on this blog under Cost of Being a Canadian Citizen
Federal Financial Administration Act
Charges for rights and privileges
19.1 The Governor in Council may, on the recommendation of the Treasury Board, (a) by regulation prescribe the fees or charges to be paid for a right or privilege conferred by or on behalf of Her Majesty in right of Canada, by means of a licence, permit or other authorization, by the persons or classes of persons on whom the right or privilege is conferred; or (b) authorize the appropriate Minister to prescribe by order those fees or charges, subject to such terms and conditions as may be specified by the Governor in Council. 1991, c. 24, s. 6.
Note what is said there and the permissive nature of the issues. As we know, authorization conferred can be withdrawn and in all cases, the one permitted or believed to have received permission (a benefit) is subject to a higher authority, the grantor of the benefit.
A wonderful truth is that Her Majesty has not honoured Her promises as per the Universal Declaration of Human Rights or International Covenants or Bill of rights regarding “the securing of their universal and effective recognition and observance”.
That is in reference to human rights and freedoms and had Her Majesty honoured Her promises made long ago, all humans would be knowledgeable of the human rights and freedoms which would of course include the enforcers of the law. To put in bluntly, the world would be a different place had the promises been honoured.
What I am saying here is that due the fact of the lack of teaching and educating and promoting of human rights and freedoms, we did things we would not likely have done otherwise one of which is apply for a driver license. As humans we have the right to use the highways free of license but we were all led to believe otherwise. The enforcers of the law being humans are also for the same reasons ignorant of their human rights and freedoms and the result is, they seem to figure all of us like them are subject to Her Majesty.
It is in the humans rights documents:
Article 30.
- Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.
Leading us to believe we need a license to use the roads, and not teaching everyone about human rights and freedoms, has resulted and does result in continued activity aimed at the destruction of our rights.
So we see that unless we seek the answers and claim and assert our human rights and freedoms we will not have them.
A bottom line is because we were not taught or educated about and human rights and freedoms and same are not being promoted, anything we did that has had a negative effect on our rights and freedom can be undone.
In other words, if the government was to say, you signed up now honour your obligation, we can say the same about Her Majesty. She signed up to teach and educate and promote human rights and freedoms before most of us were born into this world and if she had we would not have signed up. So if they want to hold us to our obligations we can hold Her Majesty to hers and who breached first? A way of leveling the playing field if you get what is said here.
I love all!