Hi Lovers
Let us put to rest what the BC is.
I have indicated here on many an occasion lately what it is and maybe now when you see what I see, calling it as I see it, you will agree.
Once you see what I see at point # 38 in the attachment here (click on the red title) then the significance of –
for whose use and benefit the name was secured by registration is obvious. Could be for you exclusively or for mutual benefit.
Registration serves to protect your interest and the government is the witness. One can make that claim or ask a claimant, for whose benefit was this name secured by registration? The idea of asking the question is not because one is stupid but the answer will enlighten e.g. a third party claimant.
As we shared here March of this year, you have the right to restrict the use of your name and thus your property. The name on the BC is derived of the SOB. It is also in the Vital Statistics Act and further clarified on the application for a BC from where the name on the BC is derived.
We also know what the government lawyer said when he appeared out of the blue to mediate a landlord tenant matter. Telling the court it does not have jurisdiction over this man and the name on those papers is of this SOB.
As I see it, all names are derived of the SOB and the government the witness, protector.
Serving through the name for mutual benefit is a function of God. The highest of Offices.
I would add to this that it may be the successful attachment to one of titles such as driver, tenant, that the name is used against you or for the benefit of a 3rd party.
Seems that if one does not know who he is, he allows them to use his name for his benefit and attach titles to him such as tenant and driver to which duties and obligations are attached…….
Johnny signed in as the alleged tenant after getting the SOB in the file. So maybe what was happening then was they know the name is his for his benefit but tried to get the title tenant upon his head which he did not take the bait (alleged tenant), hence, gov lawyer appeared out of the blue to mediate saying to the court, “no jurisdiction over this man and this name on your papers is derived of this SOB and is protected”.
All these titles, tenant, driver, etc., are creations of and defined in statute, thus, shoes to be filled by those who know not who they are and appear as performing a function of government.
It may be then that the government has the liability for what it created but what it created is not the name but the other titles, tenant, driver, purchaser, taxpayer, debtor, etc.
With love