Hi Lovers
This is for those who hold the viewpoint we are slaves and have no choice.
Some of you may be following the acknowledgment and acceptance of and re-recording of the deed to land they are doing in the U.S.A. It may be a bit early to draw conclusions but so far so good.
A quick review. Folks who were noted as tenants on the land title documents are now recorded as sole owner. The excise tax guy says this land was given by the government as evidenced by the original land patent/grant and is not taxable. Mortgages are worthless. Worthless because the mortgage as well as the insurance is on the legal title and not the land. Two worlds out there people. Which do you see?
Now, if we are total slaves like some suggest, then how are these things possible? Let us see, they were formerly tenants but now they are not tenants. That suggests loud and clear the land is our land but until we step forth just as the Fed guy in Canada said in 1878 AND CLAIM OUR INTEREST, we have more or less abandoned our interest and are mere users or tenants of property that belongs to us but we have not established a claim therefore it does not belong to us.
Now, when the deeds are properly acknowledged and accepted and re-recorded the mortgage is worthless which suggests clearly we never had to pay for the land in the first place. We thought we did but all we bought was a legal title, a piece of paper and it is that they insure (title insurance) but not for you, for the one risking lending you money to buy paper in the event you figure things out, e.g. the grant of land conveys the land free and clear. Clearly we are either ignorant or stupid for why would we pay for that what is free except we believe everything we hear?
Now I am not interested in pursuing the deed thing because I see the BC is the claim ticket that we can obtain a homestead, necessities, etc, and not have to pay or go through the process of credit or mortgage approval and then go through the deed process to get rid of the mortgage is stupid.
It may be buying the legal title has one in Admiralty but we see by the deed thing they are doing we have another choice. Whether or not one chooses the other choice I guess depends on his viewpoint.
Further, the fact these people doing the deed thing have a driver license or tax number did not interfere one iota with the process. It never came up.
If you read the post Subscription and Speculators document and did some study on that you see two possibilities, we have an interest in Canada and/or the BC evidences a right or promise accruing to the bearer.
I think it goes without saying that all we do we do in a legal name that is registered with the system and that is recognized in law. I think taking any action that is not in acceptance of that is like trying to say your mother is not your mother. In other words, we all originated from an original source and cannot separate from it and thus serve it one way or anther, willingly or ignorantly. I see the legal name thing as the same.
Synonyms of ‘interest’ are; claim, share, stake. So when I say I have an interest in Canada that is what I mean.
I love you