Hi Lovers
You really need to read about ‘scrip’. I am going out on a limb here but I think that is what a BC is, scrip.
It is much like a pawnticket as discussed here recently.
Scrip; the holder is owed something, certificate of ownership, replacement for money, token, share in a corporation.
We know there is no money and so the money game is an illusion perpetuated by a very crafty but effective marketing campaign and our continued support. Get the credit you deserve, if you buy today you save ten bucks…………..We took the bait hook line and sunker………..
This here from a previous post;
“Without offering, therefore, a recommendation in the matter, permit to remark that it seems to me to be no part of the duties of the Government to compel, so to speak, the half-breeds to prove their claims.
It is not necessary to look up parties who have claims. If they care for their interests, they themselves will come forward and establish their claims”.
We know a BC is not personal id but the way we use it in keeping with the above is contrary to its purpose. When we use it as personal id we care for our own interests like when we say I am the executor of this estate or pay these bills this is not my name and related crapola.
A BC is proof you have an interest in Canada aka. not personal identification. I shared what the Bank of Canada said to me by phone.
By the word scrip we see there are options or choices. If you read the post in which Sir John A. spoke he said there are two ways to claim land. Go and claim it now and work it and get the patent, or, take scrip which is to be used later to acquire land. Scrip is a claim ticket, valuable token.
Certificate of ownership in Canada. Now the choices in reality as i see it are two, you can claim your interest in a share of a corporation/Canada, take the money and cash out, or, claim land. As Sir John A said, if you take the land one is no longer under the PARENTAGE of the government. We have to get to land.
So if the BC is scrip as I believe it is, then we by using the BC as personal id gave the BC a purpose not intended and more importantly, not recognized, therefore, no legal basis for the claims we have made to date regarding the BC.
Using the pawn shop as an example the pawnticket/scrip means the holder is owned something and that the holder has an interest in the pawnshop, that being, not the pawnshop, but that what is yours to claim in the pawnshop, your property. In that sense as i said then, Canada is the pawnshop and all assets in Canada belong to the shareholders, us. But, as holders of scrip, we have two options, take the money or the land. Treat the scrip as a share in a corporation which is redeemable (claimable) only for money and cash out or as a share in (claim) the land.
So again I am going out on a limb but I think that if one indicates the BC is his proof of interest in Canada he is, although not confirmed, saying, this is not about my success but the success of Canada and everyone on board. That is what opens the first door.
In using the BC as personal id we create or perpetuate a total illusion. If the BC is scrip then its purpose is very narrow and if the purpose you give it is in any way indicative you use it or the name for your own interest, which you are if you do not say it establishes your interest in Canada, meaning not you, ones care is for himself and that is going totally against the grain, purpose of a BC, and now you know why we reap what we do, if, any of this is correct that is.
Like Sir John A. said, we gave them this so they could get that and gave them this and that and that and that and they complain………..
Sound familiar?
Na na na na, na na na na, hey hey hey, goodbye ego……………….Now only a fool would act solely on what he read here. Tis recommended you not watch tv and that you get out the books or on the computer, get off your ass, do your own due diligence and seek to confirm or refute the above. Just because it sounds good or reads well does not make it right or true. How many times have we reacted to what we read on the net, implemented it, and we are still here so obviously that copy cat method does not work.
Scrip is a very neat word we covered years ago but maybe did not have the eyes to see because the heart was in the wrong place. A replacement for money does not mean to get bills paid for that statement right there or mindset has ones head in the sand. Scrip if you so choose proves your interest is not in yourself and not being personal id, how can that be disputed?
If the BC is scrip then it is proof that the holder has an interest in Canada and is owed something. Just what we are owed to be honest, I have no clue, but what I can do is ASK.
Do you listen to yourself. Do you say I know nothing but then go forth as if you know? If so, clearly there is inner turmoil that should be cleared.
Now if you read about Sir John A. in the post attachment you see an order of things regarding the making of claims. If you do not claim you do not care for your interest.
You can bet your booties the scrip Sir John A. speaks of was valuable and was signed and sealed for authentication.
I love it, I mean you, I mean me, I mean one, the all.