Hi Lovers
To give you a bit of an update.
A birth certificate is a debt obligation of Her Majesty; hence Valuable TOKEN/Bank Note Company.
It is in the manner it is presented as to whether or not it will be accepted as such. If you say her majesty is iable for a debt you are not using the debt obligation properly.
Thing is this. You are liable but you can use the debt obligation of Her Majesty to cover your obligations. I say again, you are liable but you can use the debt obligation of Her Majesty to cover your obligations.
I tell you this, there is no better debt obligation than one of Her Majesty. A BC is not a security it is not a negotiable instrument and it is not personal identification. Now you know what it is.
This is how we draw on or access our credit. It must pass through Her Majesty. Why, because our energy/credit is captured, consitutes the basis of government credit, in that we do what we do, production/output of energy, in the name on the BC that is recognized in law, and is the reason for the issue of the debt obligation OF Her Majesty who is an entity. In short, because our credit consitutes the basis of government credit it has our credit; hence the issue of a debt obligation which is saying or is an acknowledgement, we have your credit/energy/output/production.
The proof it seems is in the Bank Act. I will let you seek it. I do not think I need to say what it means to be in possession of a debt obligation of Her Majesty. Would that put you above, on even ground, or under the authority of Her Majesty?
This debt obligation can be used at any time to free yourself of liabilty but is not limited to finances only.
As per the Bank Act, debt obligations are not of natural persons only entites. Did you get that? Does the significance compute?
This is all I have to say on this for now.
I will not be reachable by any means of communication from July 15 afternoon to July 23rd so please do not send me any emails during that time period.