Hi lovers
Alrighty then, this is meant to add to the post “What are You”.
I am SHAREHOLDER.
I do not buy into the concept that Canada is a corporation and so when I say shareholder I do not mean it in that sense but in this context;
Securities Act R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER S.5
Definitions
1. (1) “security” includes,
(h) any certificate of share or interest in a trust, estate or association.
By introducing myself as shareholder I am not a director or trustee or receiver or C.E.O, I am one contributing equity like shareholder equity. To be CEO etc is to glorify self which is the opposite of what Christ teaches.
Is it not the people that constitute the basis of government credit? All our productivity and resources are in Trust and is the collateral backing the system. If however the paid public servant does not perform for the shareholder I would deem that Her Majesty is not filling her role as Executor and so i would step in as acting Executor to PROTECT MY SHARE, MY INTEREST/Canada. Her Majesty has taken an oath to protect that but things are so messed up everyone, her agents and representatives included, and us, lost our way.
As a shareholder there is no reason for you to say I am anything but shareholder upon presentment of the BC, except of course if the public servant/trustee does not perform for the shareholder when asked to do so. If asking does not work then I would as Executor/Grantor, order it.
I should say here that the terms I am using here are not necessarily specific. Things are still percolating within but one thing is certain, all paid employees and agents and agencies of her majesty are trustees.
Now, to be a man is good but man is not recognized, hence, I am shareholder. People are the source of credit/equity and so as such we cannot have any other title recognized in law but shareholder so long as you identify yourself as shareholder (again nothing here is quite concrete yet). Shareholder has an interest and that is your investment in Canada and if you do not say I am shareholder there is a chance you will be recognized as something else of lesser status. Shareholder is # 1.
Now a man who is a crown attorney, as an example, is as a crown attorney a paid trustee. As a man he is like us, shareholder, but when he is playing crown attorney he is trustee. So we see it is all an act and which role do you play, what are you?
To further validate this in the mind anyhow, when Canada sezied the territories way back when anyone who could prove he was born of her soil could request and receive any 160 Acre parcel of land not claimed. Asking is not begging becuase you have to open your mouth to get something or you will not get it. Sir John A. MacDonald was pissed when he found out these parcels were being acquired by speculators from the people for a song and dance. We see here, people, and speculator, but more significantly, the fact anyone could obtain 160 Acres at the asking suggests very strongly there is not attemtp to block us from what is ours, this land IS our land, but more significantly is the reaction of Sir John A.
His actions suggest a trust because he said, mechanisms were put in place to prevent lands from being taken by speculators suggests protection. He wanted to know how this could happen.
So I believe all land is our land and the fruits of her, our collective productivity, is ours, hence in Trust. All we need do is step up as men/shareholders in the stead of children. Whether or not Canada is a corporation matters not, what you are does and that all government employees as employees are paid servants. Who do servants serve?
This is why if we not give the orders to the servant, over time the servant starts giving orders and we obey. Sound familiar? As a result of loosing our way, we all lost our way. The shareholder has become the servant and the servant the shareholder. Daaaaaaaaa.
The fact that it is your energy, your productivity, in and of itself makes the BC a security in your hands but I am not saying the name on the BC is the Estate or name for it or that it is not. I do not believe it is. I believe Canada is the grand Estate and what belongs to us, the people, men and women, is held in trust.
All things God gave us belong to us. I am not saying we own but share. There is that word ‘share’ again. We share in the earth and the fruits of our productivity is how it is meant to be and is the basis of the system. We are not in sync is all.
Every time we write a letter to government other than to give instructions, order and commands if necessary, we are acting like children. You are either head of your house or someone else is. We are going to have to get some balls because the only thing that has given them power over us or that we perceive they have power over us is FEAR tactics. Mere threats but they play on the mind big time.
As a shareholder the court has an obligation to protect your interest thus you. The latter because at that moment you are but a man who is shareholder thus not trustee or any other lesser duty bound capacity.
Bottom line at the end of the day is we need not claim any title or set out to prove our status as shareholder, we just give the orders and if challenged, ask the challenger to prove he is not trustee or that you are.
Certain public servants would be fiduciary trustees such as judges, as such they have the power to appoint a mere trustee who then has the liability in the court. That would be the acting crown attorney or lawyer for a claimant. A very hot potato.
But this is not about court matters because if people are speaking of how to do things in court they are not set their sights beyond that to be free of that. So court stuff, as interesting as it is, serves to hold one back.
So this is the last time i will reference courts or judges here.
So, you have to believe without doubt that you are in charge. It starts there, within, in that if you need a piece of paper or law or quote to define you, you are without power over the other powers. In other words, if you point to something and say something like, see it says here who I am, it surely means you do not know is what I am saying. The truth as Christ says is in you, not out there.
The saving grace if I may choose those words is the BC is proof, in absence of evidence that proves the contrary, of your share/interest in a trust.
It does not define who you are but your capacity. It is not personal identification and so what has been happening is they have been using a share certificate to identify us as other than shareholder. Walks and talks like a driver, tax payer, dentist, victim, defendant, child or from fear, must not be a shareholder and they will act against you accordingly. They are not saying you are those and other such things, it is how we are acting which is why i say, I am shareholder because at that instant that is my capacity and no other applies. As shareholder I am also beneficiary but that is the benefit of being a shareholder is all that means. A shareholder is ‘person entitled’. Is protected. Defender of the faith.
So i think we can remove, again nothing here is etched in stone yet, everything off the table and work with, I am shareholder and the BC being proof of that. I think the concept of individual Estates works against that ALL ARE ONE and is another reason I believe the Estate is Canada and that what belongs to all i(shareholder) s held in trust. I am not speaking of a financial type share although i suppose if someone wanted to cash out he may.
But this is not about getting paid off, taking brides, this here on this blog is about entering the Kingdom where one is above what is below and simply tells who (trustee) what he wants.
As a shareholder of the grand Estate, it is in your interest to take care of and help. If you were or are a shareholder in your own business, and we covered this years ago, do you not give your all and best for the business? Do you do what is best for the business? Do you protect it? Do you serve it knowing the better you do the better is serves you? The more successful it is the more successful you are.
See Canada as your business, your/our/my INTEREST. It is the focal point as far as I can tell of our energy/credit/productivity/titles.
So we start by asking and if asking does not work then we order it and if necessary kick it up and demand performance. What ever it is you want done that is not an illegal consideration, and if challenged, simply ask or demand or order the challenger prove his claim or he has no claim. Do not, I repeat, do not argue or you are loosing power. You have the BC as your trump card but I would not necessarily play it right off the get go. Give the trustee and opportunity to do the right thing. Having said that, knowing it is my energy that assets are in the name VRB, I have no fear or doubt about presenting my BC as proof of my interest in a Estate.
I see Her Majesty is the Executor (head of the Executive/State/Estate), the Governor General the administrator, the paid employees the trustee, and all of us also shareholders. 4 walls. Think about it; the Executor did not contribute equity nor the G.G nor the trustees. Who else is there but the shareholders? But again, if Her Majesty’s administration/trustee do not perform as the servants they are, I may assume the role of acting Executor to take charge.
This week I received, last two days actually, videos from three different sources, each claiming to have the answer and all three different paths. Goes to show there are many theories out there and yes, there are more ways than one to skin a cat but which cat do you want to skin?
As you know, my function here is to get out of the box and enter the Kingdom full of hope and joy and limitless potential. No more lack or subject to civil proceedings or administrative processes or how to deal with cops or fines or bills or banks or any of that crap. I am not the King of the kingdom but the son of the King of Kings, our Father who art in Heaven.
I am not at all certain that the BC name is anything more than to identify you are a shareholder. That does not mean personal id it means shareholder. I am shareholder Vic of Canada. hahahahahaha!
I mean when you read the Vital Statistics Act there is nothing in it to suggest but one thing, your folks gave you a name and the BC is certification of that fact. You can argue the fact is something else and I am not saying but I think it is hogwash. If the BC be proof of your share in the grand Estate does it matter what the name is or is not. That aside, it is not about the name but what you are. This is where I am at but the door remains open. But, we do have letters from gov’t saying the SOB is considered definitive legal proof of the intent of your folks to give the child the name on it. It is easy to see how one can conclude there must be some ulterior motive by what has been happening to us. How we are treated, but, all that may hinge on that we have not stepped up as shareholder. For lack of that we must be something else because we are on stage and this is all an act but choose your role or someone else will and as far as I can tell, shareholder is a good role for man to play. Nothing stops that man from also being a crown attorney. He would move to a different set and follow a different script.
This is why I think to say I am a man is pointless because men play roles and sure you can take the stand I am man, thus not playing a role, but neither can the law take from or serve you. As shareholder the shareholder is served because the shareholder is a reason for the existence of, in the case of a corporation, the corporation. The shareholder has an investment and that has to be protected by rules which suggests further there is a trust. In other words, when one invests in something it is taken in trust that it will be used to serve the shareholders best interest.
So we are clear here, what is shared here as stated in the Disclaimer of this blog site is not meant as conclusionary. I believe it to be most accurate perhaps with minor adjustments but would not jump on any bandwagon just yet.
Now, this site has a particular purpose and some of the posts recently are not at all in line with what I thought this blog is about, the focus. It is my belief that people attract information and so if people are in a fighting mood or court room procedure mood or how to drive or deal with cops mood what have you, they will attract it and so there is no need to post such on this blog.
Having said that this is not my blog, it is our blog. I am voicing my opinion so I am not tacitly agreeing to further such postings but will not stand in anyone’s way.
I will leave off here now for you’s to ponder and add more in the near future. I will say, I know without doubt I can prove I have an interest in a Estate.
I love you
p.s. Wally pointed out today or it came to him at the asking that for a law to be valid it must involve her majesty. Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons of Canada, enacts as follows:
He pointed out that there is no such preamble to the Income Tax Act and suggests that act is a private act. It make sense to me in that the interest of shareholders is not self but when the shareholder signed up to be paid, receive income, he went private and so private acts apply. Something to consider. That does not apply to government employees because they are paid trustees in those jobs whereas we are paid shareholders unless employed as trustees by her majesty’s administration.