Hi lovers
If you were to say I am the one that contributed the value/assets/property that is accounted in the name on or of your BC, what proof have you?
If there is money in a bank account in the name of your BC you want access to, what proof have you of your entitlement?
The BC in that sense, but not limited to, is a security. It proves in the end that the rightful holder of the BC is the one doing the work that there are assets or value in the name of a BC. I am not saying and did not say it is some form of financial security.
The BC not being personal identification is not identifying you but your entitlement. Entitlement to what, to share in our collective productivity.
God did give man dominion over the earth but unless he exercise it in proper manner, just take control like you know it is true, he is out of or not in control.
Now writing to the government to say God gave me dominion over the earth is not taking control. Giving orders knowing God gave you dominion over the earth is taking control. We are speaking in generalities here.
Writing to the government for any reason but to give orders and one is out of or not in control. Believing the government has authority over you and or your purpose is why it does have control. It did not legislate control over us it passed legislation that we responded to and obey therefore, we are not in control.
Even Moses asked the Pharaoh, “will you let my people go” is saying, you have control. Regardless, then is not now. Then is who we were not who we are or can be.
When the President of the U.S. A. demanded gold be turned over back in 1933ish, he was not speaking to the people but yet the people did as they heard and we wonder how it is we believe government has ultimate never ending control. The power is with the people but the people act like it is with government and so it is.
Every time we complain about government, as per the laws of the universe, we empower that government. If one holds the view the government has the power how the heck can one ever acquire it or true freedom? To say God will save us is to say, he has not yet done so. I say God never intended we be in bondage therefore, true freedom is here for those who want it.
We are as Abraham says and i believe, so free we choose bondage. Well we can choose another way and we do that by focusing our attention on what we want.
Now if you look at the names on the BC did you issue it? Is not the issuer with liability? So we can say an investor in a company is a surety but that is why he is a shareholder. We are not talking financial here but for ease on the mind, does not a share certificate bear the name of the issuer and the name of the one entitled to redemption? As a former owner of a couple corporations and being the sole investor, the share of the company were held by me to show my equity in the companies. The share certificate had the name of the companies, issuer, and my name, name of holder.
Let us say a bunch of us, 100 of us get together to work as a unit. We each brings something to the table and do what we do and account for it in a name for a trust. Let us say that the property that is in trust is the fruits of our productivity and that it got there by the output of our energy and not input of money. So we are talking only substance here.
We 100 love so we do not account for who does what; we just know at the end of each day the substance pot gets bigger because of our labour. Shares could be issued to each of the 100 to secure his her rights to use of our collective efforts; house, car, stuff. Let us say that over time the 100 grows to 33 million people. Certainly when we are talking about 33 million people we cannot know each contributor/grantor so such shares would be a good idea otherwise others not entitled could be entitled.
So the share means, the holder has given in the way of the fruits of his labour into the pot and as such is entitled to share in what is in the pot. Simple as that. So we see not one of us owns anything but each has use of our collective effort (output/productivity). Now like all trusts there is a trustee and beneficiary, one appointed to take care of the paperwork and all share in the benefit of our collective productivity. So one will be the trustee and settlement comes out of the trust and not from any particular individual. Not personal id.
Since we 100 or 33 million are the ones contributing we are entitled to share in the productivity and in that sense benefit or are beneficiaries. Not of any government, unless you apply for gov benefits, but of our collective productivity. As far as we can tell the government is that trustee but we recognized the government as authoritative over us and so the roles got mixed up. As far as i can tell, the BC not being personal id, what we have going on is that a certificate of share has evolved into but is not personal id.
I love you