Hi Lovers
Alrighty then. Here we go for a ride.
As much as you are the one responsible for the health of your body, so to are you just as responsible for your name. Yup, the legal name is your name like your body is your body.
You and only you is fully responsible for you and your name. Acting as if someone else is liable for you and or your name is an act of DEPENDENCE when the reason you were given a legal name recognized in law is that you can be INDEPENDENT and by that I mean, not reliant on any source but yourself for your necessities of life.
How many of you have heard a CRA agent ask, how do you get your necessities of life?
I tell you this, if you draw an income you are dependent on the employer, an outside source, for your life.
You are THE SOURCE OF CREDIT FOR YOUR NAME IF YOU SO CHOOSE TO BE, otherwise the employer or someone else or thing is and you are a dependent. You achieve independence by applying your gilt-edged credit to fund your name. If you are not funding it someone else or thing is and you are a dependent. YOU DO NOT KNOW WHO YOU ARE END OF STORY.
First off, since the name is YOUR name you can restrict or prohibit its use by others by saying so. Why does that work, because they use your name to get your credit/energy and they are doing it because we allow it. By restricting use of your name you restrict access to you, your gilt-edged credit. In other words, they come after you through your name and they get what they do through your name but you can put a kibosh on that the instant you accept it is your name, and, that you have the liability for it and the credit to offset any and all liabilities big or small.
Part one is as simple as that folks. The agents have been getting from us using our own name to do it and it is only happening because we allow it rather than say hey, that is my name and who authorized you to use it. I did posts on the ‘not for commercial use etc’ back in February or March or early April of this year.
Part two is recognizing you have the credit to settle any and all liabilities in real time and offering it in full satisfaction. At no time here am i suggesting we get involved in drafting instruments for that purpose. You tell the claimant to do that and you will sign it thereby transferring the amount of your credit to offset the debt or payment obligation.
In other words, your name is like your name for business and you are the only bank funding the enterprise, that is, unless you wish to be a dependent. You are not born with money and you cannot be made to work for it is to say you must be dependent on that source for your necessities of life, when the fact is, you is the sole source of gilt-edged credit, life giving energy to your name.
That is why your name is registered with the system. To secure it and your credit to you, the source on that, your legal name, accounts.
So to say not my name or ask who has the liability when it is you that is responsible for your name is not being responsible, it is saying, I am dependent on some other source for my life, please save me. Hahahahahaha!
There is no denying you are the source of credit, funding for your name because if not you, then who? You do it when you pay a fine. The fact your name is billed or summoned is an honour. It is recognizing you as the source of credit but you do not have to draw the funding from a source other than yourself. YOU ARE THE ONE.
You are the true source of credit for your name. Who else can be the source of or is gonna be the source of credit for YOUR name? A bank you say. Not so, because it is your credit that funds loans.
So you claim your name as your name and in so doing you secure access to your gilt-edged credit to you. You just say it. I did a piece about the name and not to be used for commercial purposes posted to this blog back in February or March or early April this year.
The only question now is what are you going to do with that what gives life to your name; your credit?
This is about all I will say on this for now to give you time to realize way more than maybe you do just how powerful you are. I will say we are talking about funding an account the way your credit card account is funded.
I was told about two recent Court cases in the U.S.A. Both to do with home schooling and both families being told they cannot do it the way they wanted. One family argued using the Constitution and the other stipulating they are obedient to God. Guess what. The family that relied on the Constitution lost and the other family won and the judge said, man cannot be forced to be obedient to the state. I’ve been saying the exact same thing but using different words. Now the family that won was approached by the state sometime after the case and asked to fill out forms.
Anyone guess why? If you say you are obedient to God then you better limit your obedience to God and not the state.
So this is real simple. You are free by saying and walking the walk your obedience is to God and you free your legal name, thus your body, when you recognize yourself as the one that can fund your name independent of all others. The question is how, directly with your gilt-edged credit (like what is funding your credit card now except the bank is in evidence as the source and you the dependent) or by other means backed by your credit.
The only thing you want to back with your credit is your name and in that sense you are self employed and self sufficient funding your own life journey with your own credit/energy.
Section 15 of the Bank Act reveals who is with the power and best credit. It is not the bank.
So your dependance comes from being obedient to God and funding your own way with your own credit in the stead of pledging it to banks or the government or bondholders or usurer or corporate employers. In other words, you do not have to draw an income from any source but rather draw on your own credit is another way to obtain necessities of life and from this information posted here, anyone should see how debts can be settled. Not run from but settled.
KNOW THYSELF. You are God, source of credit over your name and the system knows it; it is built on it but we not knowing that have been acting like dependents. Happy fourth of July when it comes.
They come at you via your name and you can stop that easily, thus securing your person and credit, but to be responsible, one must accept past and present liabilities attached to his her name and offer his her credit to settle up with and you got to know who you are and know you are with the power. Otherwise, unlike that family that won in Court, you will put yourself right back in the box if you were ever out. Stand firm and go in peace.
The people are the foundation of the entire system so stop acting like you are not and go in peace.
I should add for the benefit of those who did not notice; the family that won did not get into any name game stuff.
It is not my place to say for you but so long as you look someplace outside of you for responsibility or liability you are not ready for independence. I would go as far to say if you do not make it that your credit is the only source funding your name you are not, and cannot be, independent. Independence in this case means taking responsibility. Many folks are aware they are responsible for their reality, that they create it, yet, turn to or blame some exterior thing for their woes.
You are the one. You are the beginning you are the end. You can make it that you are the only one funding, carrying the burdens associated with your name, and in so doing offset them all with your credit. I would not draft up any paperwork that I think is required to settle a debt, I will get the claimant to do that. I am God over my name. I am responsible for it and I am the source of credit for it in this world.
By registering your birth the name is a permanent part of the system. There is no escape but to toss away all gov id but then your credit is no good to you.
Bottom line; the name is your name and you if you choose can step up as the one responsible and offer the only thing you have to settle with, gilt-edged credit/energy, or, you can work for money, pay taxes that fatten the usurer and carry on as a burdensome dependent (taxed) given you are in that case not the source of necessities of life. In other words, you are not funding your name with your credit directly = dependency.
It is your name and you cannot be made to fund it by being a dependent. The offer of your credit when you know who you are must be accepted. You have no other remedy.
We are talking about equality here. When you fund your name directly with your credit the system gets what it wants, debt free money and you get substance. A re-venuing. Credit from you in the natural world to the system and substance released from the system to you in the natural world. It is in II Corinthians 8; you a supply for their want (credit is like oxygen for the system and debt like carbon monoxide) and the system a supply for your want. All are one.
In today’s terms Render unto Caesar blah blah may mean, render to Caesar your credit he gave you, which he did as a result of taking gold out of circulation as a method of payment. If he did not give you a remedy how would payments be made? Also, you cannot be made or put in a situation of dependancy for neccessities of life is slavery. What belongs to God, the substance, can be rendered to God; in this case you since you are God over your name. Your name is a transmitting utility, or, as in the Matrix, a vessel carrying your energy/credit and you are the Captain or God. Credit is the money, legal tender.
Credit is the money, legal tender; and although you are the source of credit for your name as evidenced by a birth certificate, your name not you must be recognized on the Account as the source of credit because it not you is recognized in law. So it is okay to say you are the source of credit for the name which is true no matter how you cut it, but when connecting the name to Accounts, your name not you must be recognized as the source of credit.
No one is going to stand up for you and say, I am the source of gilt-edge credit for his name. You are the One.
I love you