Hi Lovers
We know that a BC is proof of your existence but is not personal identification, but I betchya the information used against us is information already in the system.
We were extracted from the womb of a woman and someone filled out a form certifying the birth and someone else registered that information. Then we end up with a BC. At this point we were not party to anything, but, then we used the BC to apply for a SIN # and driver license.
I suggest it is what we did, the connections we made from us to the system, what is known as information collected under the Privacy Act, your personal information, that has us bound to the system. Until we used the BC to make these various connections with the system, the game, there was no information in the system that could be used against us. Everything you say can and will be used against you but up to the point of us receiving a BC, we were not involved and it is back to that point I suggest we must return.
Up until we used the BC to connect us with the system, the game, we just is with BC in hand. Think about it, if you never applied for a BC could CRA be knocking on your door?
So in part what I am saying is that a BC is not personal id but the information in the system as it exists at this moment is your personal information is what is used against you.
So saying the BC is not personal id means nothing unless it has not been used to make connections from you to the game. For us it has and so I am suggesting we need to deal with the information currently in the system in a manner that gets us back to where we just is with BC in hand.
For example, if your private information already held in information banks was removed or flagged, then it could not be used against you. It could though be used for you or not at all.
I am setting the foundation here and not building on top of that for this post because the point of this post is; could it be that it is the information already in the system that got there as a result of our actions that is used against us? That is considered your personal information, hence protection of information Acts, but such also is used to identify you.
The fact that information from you exists in the system may be an indication to the system you do not know who you are.
Bottom line what I am saying is we have to address the information already in the system so it is not used to identify us or be used against us in a way that lessens our natural capacity as I AM.
I was browsing through the provincial government web site and search every form they have in the repository. It appears some of these forms are used to access or confirm or deny information about who the requester believes is you.
Are you seeing my point? So what that a BC is not personal id if the information that is used to identify or against us is the information already in the system. It has to be because as i say, if you never applied for a SIN number could CRA knock on your door? That is but one example how we can see that what happened after stage one, we is and with BC in hand (had not used it to apply for anything yet), that has us bound to the system because they keep tracking us via that information.
I am not suggesting the method which one may use to address the information already in the system as I see many options, but if you were to legally sever a connection then you are effectively disconnected from that part of the game as far as being the target. Because at that point I AM is and has BC in hand and BC with name does not id I AM.
By using the BC as we did is when we became recognized as having the liability. Something we did or did not do has caused the system to recognize us as other than just is. In other words, up until we used the BC to make connections from us to the system on a personal information basis as we have, we did not have the liability for the name on the BC. That is not to say we do not accept liability for the name as I AM (divine being).
In fact Lee shared today a TV series called True Blood. He says in the first years episodes the game, the players and rules are revealled. The corporate entities, the dead, are represented by the vampires who have a secret to keep from the people and that is, they need us yet they have us beleiving we need them. haha! We see it by our actions it is true. In their with the vampires is a lady who is human (alive) and who accepts liability.
Because of that the vampires (the dead corporate entities) leave her alone. If you have not noticed, once you are connected with a corporate entity it does everything it can to suck out of you whatever it can.
Again, the point of this post is I am suggesting that it is the information already in the system that is used to identify you or target you and that it is that that must be addressed so we get back to the beginning. That being, the moment just prior to using the BC to connect with the system; when the BC proves your existence as I AM but not as the name on the BC. At that point you cannot be seen as having the liability for the name but by accepting liability for it, you are the unidentifiable source on that account.
Ekharte Tolle does a great bit on ‘identity’. How we identify ourselves is how we are identified.
I love you