Hi Lovers
I thought to share this from john as it rings true,
"capacity
what do the records show?
what is your capacity?
is there a clear delineation of your role, or is your character that of the fictional realm
where is the record of your true nature, and is it correct?"
A big question that I think is good to ask self is, is my character that of the fictional realm. It speak of a consciousness.
Further to that and the Notice of Understanding and Averment of I AM. Some folks seems to be a bit confused and it is my hope this here alleviates some confusion.
Some are concerned with or stuck on, I cannot or should not work for money. Should not draw an income. With respect to income no income is your income. Money paid for employment is evidence of your credit extended to the registered name, name of child, payee. Said name is considered a taxpayer because the income tax charge is the interest on your credit, the principal sum, or gross amount of paid to the registered name for your labour output.
In other words, consider any and all income, pay cheque issued to registered name, annual or life gross pay is evidence of a loan by you of your credit to said name. As loans go there is an interest obligation. As you are the soul or principal creditor for the registered name given you by way of a birth certificate, the interest or taxes in this case are collected for you. This is why I see us as the bondholder, the ones mentioned in the Standing Committee on Banking and Commerce. The BC is the bond and we have one thus are the bondholder. You see, as mentioned previously we as creditors have two choices, foreclose or make claim for "you owe me this much", or, forgive the debt. This as the last few posts is about forgiving the debt. Now with respect to income, when you have forgiven the registered name of its debt to you then the tax department has heard from the creditor of the said registered name and as a result of the creditor forgiving the said debt, the tax department has no reason to collect taxes to pay you back because you have forgiven the debt. That is what I think Ed Griffin meant in his book Creature From Jekyll Island when he wrote, they will tax us to death to pay us back if that is what it takes.
In any event, that is exactly what I see is going on and it is only happening because we act like debtors or have the character of the artificial-fictitious realm.
Now some people have been working for years which means a lot of credit (principal sum) has been extended to their registered name. So long as this continues, the creditor does not foreclose or forgive, the indebtedness of their registered name to you increases and so to does the interest obligation. It is like we keep extending (loaning) credit to their registered names means a big loan and a bigger debt obligation and ever increasing interest obligation. The greater the amount of the unclaimed principal the greater the interest obligation becomes and it is only the interest obligation they are concerned with as for collecting it for you. But as i say, and this is about forgiving not foreclosing or making claim, you owe me, when we arrive as the creditor and forgive the debt it is finished.
The registered name is no longer considered a tax payer as a result. This is because you forgave the debt being the principal amount which cancels the interest/tax obligation.
Now dealing with Human Rights and Freedoms does not address your capacity or status as creditor nor does it deal with the debt. In fact I would say that claiming a human right or freedom to an artificial entity has one knowingly or unknowingly as a character of the fictional realm. As Ra said in the Law of One, you either serve self or other self and as far as I can tell, the mentality of claiming human rights stuff and getting food and clothing and bills paid is about serving self. Where in these claims or claiming process is one saying anything of serving? Yes we may be entitled to food, clothing, housing, freedom ,fun, enjoyment, education, perfect health, great friends, love, children, travel, etc, but by divine right, not some document drafted that not one of us is party to.
I see coming forth as the creditor of the particular registered name you use and forgiving the debt catapults one over and beyond the offers and limitations of the artificial entities, state parties to the human rights documents. As a creditor/God to Canada do you not think you are above the need to request or demand access to food and clothing etc? Jesus said, be not justified by the law and is not making claims under human rights legislation issued by or for artificial entities not doing just that? Furthermore, if you know yourself to be an extension of the divine, the one infinite creator, why on earth would you appeal to some earthly authority for anything? I think what has people interested in the human rights stuff like bills of exchange stuff is there is something in it for them, free clothing, housing, food. In other words, the consciousness is me me me and demonstrative of a character that is of the fictional realm, this world, because, in my mind, it sure is not divine or an expression of one who knows he she is an extension of the divine. Imagine the one infinite creator had that attitude. We would not be and as much as human beings may have rights so to do creditors. The imposing on us of legal and fictitious titles is to compensate for our lack of knowing who we are. If creditor is a legal term it is above all other legal terms. He was a credit to his community does not mean financially. She is a credit worthy woman does not mean she pays her bills on time. No business or enterprise or government can have credit, money in the bank, if not for the people giving energy into such things. Credit is derived from human energy/labour and labour is the one thing we can say we own and that we can decide what to do with it. Whenever labour is pledged such as ours is to Canada, by and through our use of their registered name, meaning we have no choice, a debt obligation to us is created. Compare that to one who starts a new business. He knows he has to provide his energy to the business. He may recognize the business has a need for some free energy which means the owner(s)/shareholder(s) will not draw a wage. In any event his energy given in the name of the business is credit for the business/Canada. As the owner is not drawing a wage the business/Canada is indebted to man or legal status such as owner/shareholder/creditor.
What a man says and does is who a man is. If a man says he is a creditor and he is, then man is a creditor. If he acts like a tenant he is a tenant. If he says he is none of those legal personalities, then what is he? Does he exist? If he not exist can he be a creditor, or can he claim for food and clothing and housing from the artificial? As I and another I know see it, when the debt is forgiven the status of creditor is removed and the status of debtor removed from their registered name. The instant the name is charged the credit is there to extinguish the obligation of the name you use. When government charges their name it cares not how large a debt it may impose. As the creditor of the name charged you do not care either and furthermore, if the government can do that, with the obvious expectation of drawing on your credit, you can do the same and issue the credit. After forgiveness, the issue of credit to settle obligations of name is, if it be your will, pre-authorized.
A CRA agent told me the people are the government. At first I thought F%^& you. But after thinking on it I think I see he may be correct. We the people constitute the basis of government, our collective credit.
The law follows our choices and silence is a choice. If a creditor not indicate himself as such he may be classed something other than and I think we can all agree we have acted like debtors and subjects of artificial entities. That we have acted as characters (legal persons) of the fictional realm.
Now forgiving the debt of the registered name to you in and of itself does not make one, the forgiver, a creditor/God to Canada. It is however the initial step that must be taken. As I m still pondering I shant get into it here what I think the move is that makes one a creditor to Canada. They have to balance the books.
I thought to share this from john as it rings true,
"capacity
what do the records show?
what is your capacity?
is there a clear delineation of your role, or is your character that of the fictional realm
where is the record of your true nature, and is it correct?"
A big question that I think is good to ask self is, is my character that of the fictional realm. It speak of a consciousness.
Further to that and the Notice of Understanding and Averment of I AM. Some folks seems to be a bit confused and it is my hope this here alleviates some confusion.
Some are concerned with or stuck on, I cannot or should not work for money. Should not draw an income. With respect to income no income is your income. Money paid for employment is evidence of your credit extended to the registered name, name of child, payee. Said name is considered a taxpayer because the income tax charge is the interest on your credit, the principal sum, or gross amount of paid to the registered name for your labour output.
In other words, consider any and all income, pay cheque issued to registered name, annual or life gross pay is evidence of a loan by you of your credit to said name. As loans go there is an interest obligation. As you are the soul or principal creditor for the registered name given you by way of a birth certificate, the interest or taxes in this case are collected for you. This is why I see us as the bondholder, the ones mentioned in the Standing Committee on Banking and Commerce. The BC is the bond and we have one thus are the bondholder. You see, as mentioned previously we as creditors have two choices, foreclose or make claim for "you owe me this much", or, forgive the debt. This as the last few posts is about forgiving the debt. Now with respect to income, when you have forgiven the registered name of its debt to you then the tax department has heard from the creditor of the said registered name and as a result of the creditor forgiving the said debt, the tax department has no reason to collect taxes to pay you back because you have forgiven the debt. That is what I think Ed Griffin meant in his book Creature From Jekyll Island when he wrote, they will tax us to death to pay us back if that is what it takes.
In any event, that is exactly what I see is going on and it is only happening because we act like debtors or have the character of the artificial-fictitious realm.
Now some people have been working for years which means a lot of credit (principal sum) has been extended to their registered name. So long as this continues, the creditor does not foreclose or forgive, the indebtedness of their registered name to you increases and so to does the interest obligation. It is like we keep extending (loaning) credit to their registered names means a big loan and a bigger debt obligation and ever increasing interest obligation. The greater the amount of the unclaimed principal the greater the interest obligation becomes and it is only the interest obligation they are concerned with as for collecting it for you. But as i say, and this is about forgiving not foreclosing or making claim, you owe me, when we arrive as the creditor and forgive the debt it is finished.
The registered name is no longer considered a tax payer as a result. This is because you forgave the debt being the principal amount which cancels the interest/tax obligation.
Now dealing with Human Rights and Freedoms does not address your capacity or status as creditor nor does it deal with the debt. In fact I would say that claiming a human right or freedom to an artificial entity has one knowingly or unknowingly as a character of the fictional realm. As Ra said in the Law of One, you either serve self or other self and as far as I can tell, the mentality of claiming human rights stuff and getting food and clothing and bills paid is about serving self. Where in these claims or claiming process is one saying anything of serving? Yes we may be entitled to food, clothing, housing, freedom ,fun, enjoyment, education, perfect health, great friends, love, children, travel, etc, but by divine right, not some document drafted that not one of us is party to.
I see coming forth as the creditor of the particular registered name you use and forgiving the debt catapults one over and beyond the offers and limitations of the artificial entities, state parties to the human rights documents. As a creditor/God to Canada do you not think you are above the need to request or demand access to food and clothing etc? Jesus said, be not justified by the law and is not making claims under human rights legislation issued by or for artificial entities not doing just that? Furthermore, if you know yourself to be an extension of the divine, the one infinite creator, why on earth would you appeal to some earthly authority for anything? I think what has people interested in the human rights stuff like bills of exchange stuff is there is something in it for them, free clothing, housing, food. In other words, the consciousness is me me me and demonstrative of a character that is of the fictional realm, this world, because, in my mind, it sure is not divine or an expression of one who knows he she is an extension of the divine. Imagine the one infinite creator had that attitude. We would not be and as much as human beings may have rights so to do creditors. The imposing on us of legal and fictitious titles is to compensate for our lack of knowing who we are. If creditor is a legal term it is above all other legal terms. He was a credit to his community does not mean financially. She is a credit worthy woman does not mean she pays her bills on time. No business or enterprise or government can have credit, money in the bank, if not for the people giving energy into such things. Credit is derived from human energy/labour and labour is the one thing we can say we own and that we can decide what to do with it. Whenever labour is pledged such as ours is to Canada, by and through our use of their registered name, meaning we have no choice, a debt obligation to us is created. Compare that to one who starts a new business. He knows he has to provide his energy to the business. He may recognize the business has a need for some free energy which means the owner(s)/shareholder(s) will not draw a wage. In any event his energy given in the name of the business is credit for the business/Canada. As the owner is not drawing a wage the business/Canada is indebted to man or legal status such as owner/shareholder/creditor.
What a man says and does is who a man is. If a man says he is a creditor and he is, then man is a creditor. If he acts like a tenant he is a tenant. If he says he is none of those legal personalities, then what is he? Does he exist? If he not exist can he be a creditor, or can he claim for food and clothing and housing from the artificial? As I and another I know see it, when the debt is forgiven the status of creditor is removed and the status of debtor removed from their registered name. The instant the name is charged the credit is there to extinguish the obligation of the name you use. When government charges their name it cares not how large a debt it may impose. As the creditor of the name charged you do not care either and furthermore, if the government can do that, with the obvious expectation of drawing on your credit, you can do the same and issue the credit. After forgiveness, the issue of credit to settle obligations of name is, if it be your will, pre-authorized.
A CRA agent told me the people are the government. At first I thought F%^& you. But after thinking on it I think I see he may be correct. We the people constitute the basis of government, our collective credit.
The law follows our choices and silence is a choice. If a creditor not indicate himself as such he may be classed something other than and I think we can all agree we have acted like debtors and subjects of artificial entities. That we have acted as characters (legal persons) of the fictional realm.
Now forgiving the debt of the registered name to you in and of itself does not make one, the forgiver, a creditor/God to Canada. It is however the initial step that must be taken. As I m still pondering I shant get into it here what I think the move is that makes one a creditor to Canada. They have to balance the books.